Health Economics Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Health Economics - Research Paper ExampleThis means that most firms sampled that remained in vexation lies below the mean rating of the ratio of current assets and current liabilities. The median is greater than the mean. Furthermore, it is noted that there is an outlier in the data with a firm present a ratio of 0.23. The scattering is likewise spread wide as shown by low kurtosis value and longer range.On the other hand, the shape of the distribution for firms that failed is positively skewed. The data gathered showed that most firms that failed ar above the mean. The distribution is also peaked and shorter ranged.b) To test the supposal that failed firms view a lower ratio of assets to liabilities, the statistical procedure conducted is t-test. A null hypothesis is first created. The null hypothesis would be that the ratio of current assets and liabilities has no effect on the supremacy or failure of the firm. If the data departs from the null hypothesis, then our alterna te hypothesis that failed firms have a lower ratio of assets to liabilities will be correct. Below are the data for the t-test.The results as shown by the table above indicated that there is a significant difference in the assets to liabilities ratio between the firms that remained and the firms that failed at the 0.05 level. ... The distribution is also peaked and shorter ranged.b) To test the hypothesis that failed firms have a lower ratio of assets to liabilities, the statistical procedure conducted is t-test. A null hypothesis is first created. The null hypothesis would be that the ratio of current assets and liabilities has no effect on the success or failure of the firm. If the data departs from the null hypothesis, then our alternate hypothesis that failed firms have a lower ratio of assets to liabilities will be correct. Below are the data for the t-test.t-Test Two-Sample Assuming Equal VariancesAlpha = 0.05Firms that RemainedFirms that FailedMean1.730.82Variance0.410.23Obse rvations6833Pooled Variance0.35Hypothesized Mean Difference0df99t Stat7.172P(T